Post by Adam Albright
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 10:28:28 -0500, "george"
You REALLY are a dumb piece of shit. You ignorant loser. A chickenhawk
avocates wars, but never fights it them himself. Bush, Cheney,
The CHICKEN (people like you) has never served in the volunteer military.
Fuck you moron. I did serve you clueless escapee from some insane
asylum. No, I didn't volunteer, I was drafted. Get a clue fuckwit.
EVERY guy I met at Ft. Polk in 1965, my first stop, said that their
"volunteering" was the biggest mistake they made in their long lives.
Go check the Vietnam wall in DC and see why doofus. What did we
accomplish? Not a fucking thing. We got our asses kicked and all for
nothing. Now, we're doing it again in Iraq. Bush the idiot he is won't
be happy until we're at war with Iran, so he can ring up something
like 100,000 dead for nothing.
First of all, I doubt you ever served. Because if you did, you'd have know
that we defeated the North Vietnam at least 3 times during the war: The
Idrang Valley in the central highlands, 68 Tet, and after Linebacker I&II.
We "lost" Vietnam when the DEMOCRATS in Congress *prohibited* any US
reinforcement, or resupply, of the South in December 1974. We watched,
with our hands tied, as the North Vietnamese government *VIOLATED* the Paris
Peace treaty and invaded the south in 1975. Our hands were *deliberately*
tied by the DEMOCRAT MAJORITY in Congress.
THAT is why the sacrifice of 56,000 men for South Vietnam's freedom was
wasted. YOUR PARTY -- the *surrender* and *APPEASEMENT* Party, the TREASON
Party, the DEMOCRATIC PARTY was responsible. This still pisses me off
after all these years! It was the result of the McGovernites taking over
the party, which was why I stopped being a Democrat.
Second of all, THIS IS NOT VIETNAM! It is NOT EVEN CLOSE, you fucking
If it were, you God Damned SURRENDER MONKEY DICKHEAD, we would have invaded
the north in the fall of 1965, captured Hanoi in November of 1965, Ho
himself would have been captured and put on trial for crimes against
humanity in the fall of 1967 and hanged a year or so afterwards (like what
is going to happen to Saddam), North Vietnam would have had free elections,
under a "provisional authority" in late 1966, followed by a ratification of
a democratic constitution in late 1967 and a parliamentary one in early
1968. *IF* Iraq and Vietnam were "the same thing" as you fucking TRAITORS
love to pretend is true.
Oh, and POL POT, would have never been able to murder 2.25 million of his
own people in 1975.
Too bad Lyndon Johnson and Robert Strange McNamara were so FUCKING
INCOMPETENT while trying to micromanage the war.
Third of all, among the successes from invading Iraq comes the removal of
the Syrian Army from Lebanon, the dismantling of the Libyan WMD program, the
destruction of the "Arab Strongman" myth, destruction of the Al Qaeda
"invincible warrior of Allah" myth, and putting Saddam Hussein on trial with
his eventual hanging.
And for the first time in decades, the Iraqi people have a DEMOCRATICALLY
ELECTED GOVERNMENT of their own and are free of Saddam's rape rooms, his
shredding machines, and mass graves filled with the bodies of murdered Kurds
and Shiites. Have you forgotten why Saddam was called "The Butcher of
So, why don't you just shut the fuck up, you ignorant asshole. America did
a good thing by taking down Saddam.
Post by Adam Albright
The CHICKEN (people like you) saw the burning World Trade Center collapse,
on 9/11/01, but REFUSED to volunteer to serve his country after it was
How more times you need to prove you're a clueless asshole? The 9/11
Commission confirmed that Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with Iraq.
We already know they has no WMD's. What was Bush's REAL reason for
starting a war with Iraq?
9/11/01 was the date when the average American learned that we were at war
with terrorists and those that support them. 9/11/01 was the day that
changed EVERYTHING in the world. It was the day when most Americans (I
specifically exclude leftist traitors like you and "GOP"), decided that
America is NEVER, EVER going to be attacked by terrorists that way again,
and that those countries that supported terrorists in any way were going to
be smacked down in revenge.
It is an established fact that Saddam and bin Laden worked together several
times in the 1990's.
I'll repeat the above so that even a lying leftist asshole like yourself can
read it again: It is an established fact that Saddam and bin Laden worked
together several times in the 1990's.
This was known to Clinton Administration, who included Saddam as an
accessory to their indictment of bin Laden in 1998. It was also known to
the 9/11 Commission.
Clearly, you NEVER read the 9/11 Commission report, OR the statement of the
Democratic Co-Chair, former Rep Lee Hamilton, who openly acknowledges that
there was an ongoing cooperative or corroborative relationship between
Saddam and bin Laden:
"I must say I have trouble understanding the flack over this. The Vice
President is saying, I think, that there were connections between al Qaeda
and Saddam Hussein's government. We don't disagree with that. What we have
said is what the governor just said, we don't have any evidence of a
cooperative, or a corroborative relationship between Saddam Hussein's
government and these al Qaeda operatives with regard to the attacks on the
United States. So it seems to me the sharp differences that the press has
drawn, the media has drawn, are not that apparent to me."
[Lee Hamilton, Co-Chair, 9-11 Commission]
Saddam and Al Qaeda were allies, and just because Saddam may not (and the
captured documents are still being translated) have directly assisted bin
Laden for 9/11, he most certainly DID fund and materially assist Al Qaeda's
offshoot Abu Sayyaf -- resulting in the murder of innocent Americans.
The recently translated documents corroborated the warning provided by the
government of Russia (made publicly known by President Vladimir Putin in
2004), that Saddam was planning his own 9/11-type strike against the USA.
In addition, the government of Iraq had already attempted to assassinate
former President George HW Bush, and had repeatedly attacked US aircraft on
UN approved missions over Iraq. Accordingly, a state of war already
existed de facto between Iraq and the USA.
What part of this do you not understand you FUCKING MORON?
And (2) WMD were found in Iraq. You (and the leftist "MSM") are in denial
about it. In fact, the leftist MSM has embargoed and any reference to it
(3) Can you say "regime change" and "the liberation of 26 million people
from a monsterm who murdered a million arabs during his reign" and "kill
that damned snake named "Saddam" before he can get close enough to strike
I knew you could.
Post by Adam Albright
Chickenhawks (as you call Limbaugh and Nugent), like the real hawks, eat
cowardly libby-dem CHICKENS like you for lunch! You're "what's for dinner,"
What hate filled morons like you eat for lunch is your own vomit,
What we do is stand up to lying TRAITOR-FUCKS like YOU! And then we put you
in your place by exposing you as the insane, lying, hate-filled, moonbat
ASSHOLES you really are. We make sure America knows that leftwing traitors
live among them and who they are.
Post by Adam Albright
because literally has you proved over and over you are very unstable
and most likely legally insane.
You and you fellow evil assholes, don't even dwell on the same planet as the
rest of us. How would you know?
Now be a good boy, Adam ALL-DIM, and fuck off!
"The left is engaged in treason. Make no mistake about it." [Clayton